All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident: Arthur Schopenhauer -- In questions of science the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual: Galileo Galilei -- Science is a wonderful thing if one does not have to earn one's living at it: Albert Einstein -- When you have eliminated the impossible, what ever remains, however improbable must be the truth: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle -- We all agree that your theory is crazy, but is it crazy enough? Niels Bohr -- Whenever a true theory appears, it will be its own evidence. Its test is that it will explain all phenomena: Ralph Waldo Emerson -- Since the mathematicians invaded Relativity, I do not understand it myself anymore: Albert Einstein -- I would say that the aether is a medium invented by man for the purpose of propagating his misconceptions from one place to another: W.F.G. Swann: -- Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone: Albert Einstein -- Physics is mathematical not because we know so much about the physical world, but because we know so little: Bertrand Russell -- If I could explain it to the average person, I would not have been worth the Nobel Prize: R. P. Feynman -- I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use: Galileo Galilei -- How dare we speak of the laws of chance? Is not chance the antithesis of all law?: Bertrand Russell -- Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I´m not sure about the former: Albert Einstein -- The glory of mathematics is that you don't have to say what you are talking about: Richard Feynman -- Anything is possible if you don´t know what you are talking about: Author Unknown -- In life, everything is relative - except Einstein´s theory: Leonid S. Sukhorukov -- Don´\'t worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you´ll have to ram them down people´s throats: Howard Aiken --A day will come undoubtedly when the ether will be discarded as useless: H. Poincaré -- First they tell you you´re wrong and they can prove it; then they tell you you´re right but it isn´t important; then they tell you it´s important but they knew it all along: Charles Kettering -- It is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make their appearance in the world: Aristotle -- The opposite of a true statement is a false statement. The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth: Niels Bohr -- A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it: Max Planck -- Euclid taught me that without assumptions there is no proof. Therefore, in any argument, examine the assumptions: Eric Temple Bell -- Half this game is ninety percent mental: Yogi Berra

Is Science Lost ? part 2 - Black Holes; hit or myths


Tickner, Clive


Research Papers





Date Published:

September 6, 2021




Einstein, John Wheeler, Spacetime Matrix, Cosmological Constant, Black Holes, Event Horizon, Red-Shift, Photons, Anti-protons, Annihilation, Data collection, Data interpretation, The Event Horizon Telescope, Galaxies and Supernova, Milky Way


Further to my previous paper "Is Science Lost" of July 14th 2021, in this journal, this essay continues with the problematic issue of Black Holes, which have become such a significant part of the mythology of current cosmology. The presence of a Black Hole is inferred by its interaction with other matter and it is the contention that orbiting stars might be an indication of a Black Hole's location and mass, although none have yet been identified. Given that, far away, from a Black Hole's gravitational influence, its external gravitational field is identical to that of any other body of the same mass, this when viewed from Earth, must seriously impede the separation of any Black Hole from all the other material in the Cosmos. So, do Black Holes actually exist in nature or are they merely pathological solutions to Einstein's equations? Is spacetime merely a replacement for an unknown force in space, waiting to be replaced by yet another claim? Is cosmological physics lost? Maybe.


Steve Olah(Laguna Woods, United States):
This work is a fine continuation of the first part by the author. Good reading. Pay attention.
Black Holes. Not a very descriptive name. Maybe a black accumulator?
Scientists relied on magic for centuries. One major magic is field theory. We don't know why M1 attracts M2. It must be gravitational field. OK. So now it is curvature of space time. Let me rephrase: We don't know why Q1 attracts -Q2, must be electromagnetic field. And so on. They simply do not know. To muddy the water, the quantum people got involved. They don't know either, but the professor's title earns good money.
Black Hole. What a hoax. Close to Infinite negative energy in empty space. Magic. Bad enough to imagine energy in empty space, but negative energy?
Please, somebody help us.

Posted: September 07, 2021 @ 4:21:23 am
1 Replies

Gerd Termathe(Friedberg, Germany):
If you want to get an impression how a black hole may look like, have a look at my Geogebra-animation for a Helium atom:
(to start the animation set the slider at the variable to zero and klick the start button next to it).
The animation is based on the very first eigenvalue x=tan(x) (x1=4.493409), which gives in the shown case v=1.247c. Eigenvalues are angles.
The black hole at the center is a region where not light comes in.

Posted: September 10, 2021 @ 11:31:58 am

Add a Comment

<<< Back