BENEFITS OF BECOMING A **GS JOURNAL MEMBER**
LEARN MORE

**Author:**

Falkner, E.

**Category:**

Research Papers

**Sub-Category:**

Relativity Theory

**Language:**

English

**Date Published:**

October 21, 2020

**Downloads:**

29

**Keywords:**

N/A

**Abstract:**

The principle of relativity means that every movement in absolutely empty space is relative, or it is impossible to find out whether an observer is at rest or moving at constant speed. Einstein accepted the principle, but he claimed that moving clocks run slower than clocks that do not move. Since it is impossible to determine whether an object is moving in empty space or not, this assertion contradicts the principle of relativity. To get around this problem, it was necessary to make a new assumption: Every clock "sees" other clocks running slower when they "move" relative to it. Following this assumption, each clock must run faster and slower than any other clock at the same time. The problem is known as the twin paradox. If one clock runs slower than another clock, then it is not possible that the other clock runs slower than this clock. After Einstein was made aware of the contradiction, he kept finding new excuses and finally succeeded in establishing his theory as the most ingenious theory ever. But the theory is full of contradictions and silly suppositions, which cannot be justified by logical argumentation.

Congratulations! You are emerging as an eloquent and insight observer and critic of Albert Einstein. Please continue.

You write in your paper that according to Voigt time became relative. In my opinion, this is not quite correct, because Voigt had calculated the Doppler effect in his work. The calculation applies to a light source that moves relative to the wave carrying medium.

SRT is completely erroneous since it is based on the wrong kind of transformations: they have lost the scale factor characterizing the Doppler effect.

First, Lorentz considered a more general form of transformations (with a scale factor), but then he, and also Poincare and Einstein equated it 1 without proper grounds. Their form was artificially narrowed, the formulas became incorrect. This led to a logical contradiction of the theory, to unsolvable paradoxes.

Accordingly, GRT is also incorrect.

For more details, see my brochure "Memoir on the Theory of Relativity and Unified Field Theory" (2000):

http://vixra.org/abs/1802.0136

First, Lorentz considered a more general form of transformations (with a scale factor), but then he, and also Poincare and Einstein equated it 1 without proper grounds. Their form was artificially narrowed, the formulas became incorrect. This led to a logical contradiction of the theory, to unsolvable paradoxes.

Accordingly, GRT is also incorrect.

For more details, see my brochure "Memoir on the Theory of Relativity and Unified Field Theory" (2000):

http://vixra.org/abs/1802.0136

**3** total records on 1 pages