ruggeri antonio(johannesburg, South Africa):
JHB 2020 07 05
concerning the Ether/ESF of which physical characters debates carry on unabated, the model I put forward is hopefully a good one if one judges the results and conclusions I managed to reach.
I come quickly to the point, with theory of its existence and assumption that the Ether/ESF is absorbed by the physical Gravitational mass, back in the 2007 I calculated what has never dared up today, I mean the simple formula giving the dissipation coming out of any gravitational mass in Quanta of mass, lately I managed to improve my results thanks to the forgotten works (Gas Law) of A. Avogadro defining a particle of mass IP that is basic to the clusters defining the nuclei of the molecular entities on the "Periodic Table" , through it was possible to improve on Plank's Quantum and have a deeper intuition on How gravity Works.
A. Einstein must be remembered for his achievements concerning the famous "Equivalence"and his contribution to the quantum theory, the "Relativity" concepts are only half of what Relativity should be and for that reason misses the full perspective since his Law of "equivalence" needs my "Law of dissipation" and a lot of associated concepts to be considered.a chapter named "Relativity".
Furthermore his "Space-Time" claims are a total disaster since in affirming that Gravity is a character of Space dependent from presence of Gravitational mass he forgot to add a physical explanation of the effect to the cause as if Gravity were a "magic wand" in presence of which the Space was forced to react, in effects is the capacity to absorb Ether/ESF by Gravitational mass that generates the composite field of Depression and Flow (of Ether/ESF) around it, and from which derive the gravitational effects acting inside the central gravitational mass and over masses a distance in that field.
Through his Law of equivalence alone I managed to solve quite a few physical problems such as how in the gravity storescompresses quanta inside a physical mass ready to be degraded again into energized quanta in dissipation (LENR) etc...
My feeling is that in his career as Science-man he loved to make a show but now the legacy is judged by "results"., what is to be avoided is unprepared folks that tend to make a cult of his theories without grasping a nut out of them, it happened to me lately to disclose a few of my concepts, as above, and unceremoniously my comment was dismissed/cancelled.....
Posted: July 05, 2020 @ 11:03:59 am